Jose Alvarado
A pesky, full-court pest of a backup point guard who lives in passing lanes and orchestrates the bench — 87th-percentile playmaking — while playing well above his size defensively. The scoring is limited (7.4 a game on 35.2% from three across two teams) and he's turnover-prone, but the energy and on-ball pressure are real. Holds a player option.
NBA player ratings
0–99 · 2025-26 formSkill ratings are 2025-26 per-game and advanced stats (Basketball-Reference) ranked 0–99 within position (guards vs guards, bigs vs bigs). Overall is anchored to EPM impact on a non-linear curve, nudged by these skills; Offense and Defense come from box plus-minus. A player who missed the latest season is shown from his most recent one.
Career
2021-22 to 2025-26 · 5 seasonsRegular season, 2003-04 onward (Basketball-Reference). Averages are weighted by games played; honours count awards won, not finishes. “Current players” means the 802 who played in the last three seasons.
Trajectory
2023-24 → 2025-26 · age 25 → 27Jose, at 27, has held steady — 2.1 → 1.7 wins of value over the window.
Seasons from Basketball-Reference (2023-24 → 2025-26). Production is box plus-minus, a per-possession measure. Value is VORP-based wins, so it also counts games played. Contract value is what each season’s play would fetch on the open market. The dotted 2026-27 point is a forecast: his established level, a year older, assuming a normal season.
Contract
2026-27Market value is an estimate, not a reported figure: what his play is forecast to fetch on the open market in 2026-27 — his current rating, a year older. Cap thresholds are projected for 2026-27 until the league sets them.
2026-27 off-season
1 move- Jun 26
OFFICIAL means the league’s own records carry the move; AGREED means a trusted insider reported it and the league has not processed it yet. Terms and attribution come from the wire, which is the only source that carries them.
Plays like
same positionNearest skill profiles across the seven rating axes — who he plays like, not who is as good. The rating beside each name answers that second question.