🏀Front Office2026-27
 
← Los Angeles Clippers
75
OVR

Bradley Beal

Los Angeles Clippers · #0 · Rotation
SG6'4"207 lbage 3314 yrs expFloridaSaint Louis, MO
10th best of 13 on LACworth +0.4 wins to the rotation
OFF76DEF70
Elite interior finisher & scorer
LAC
Los Angeles Clippers
Western · Pacific · proj. 42-40 (▲+0.9)
→
All-NBA3× All-Star

A three-time All-Star scoring guard now in a reduced, veteran-minimum role with a player option. There's no 2025-26 sample provided to grade his form, but at his best he's a smooth three-level scorer and capable secondary creator whose defense and durability have long been the question marks.

17
PPG
3.3
RPG
3.7
APG
1.1
SPG
0.5
BPG
GP 53MPG 32.1FG% 49.73P% 38.6FT% 80.3TS% 59.8USG% 22.1PER 15.2BPM -1.1VORP 0.4EPM +0.2
2024-25 regular season · bars are percentile at his position

NBA player ratings

0–99 · 2024-25 form
Inside finishing92
Scoring88
Rim protection87
Shooting79
Playmaking70
Perimeter defense69
Rebounding65

Skill ratings are 2024-25 per-game and advanced stats (Basketball-Reference) ranked 0–99 within position (guards vs guards, bigs vs bigs). Overall is anchored to EPM impact on a non-linear curve, nudged by these skills; Offense and Defense come from box plus-minus. A player who missed the latest season is shown from his most recent one.

Career

2012-13 to 2025-26 · 14 seasons
21.4
PPG
4.0
RPG
4.3
APG
807
GAMES
Points 17,306Win Shares 58.4Starts 758Best season 2016-17 · 23.1 ppg
Games played, last three seasons46%
AMONG CURRENT PLAYERS
18th in career points

Regular season, 2003-04 onward (Basketball-Reference). Averages are weighted by games played; honours count awards won, not finishes. “Current players” means the 802 who played in the last three seasons.

Trajectory

2023-24 → 2025-26 · age 30 → 32
▬Steady

Bradley, at 32, was as productive as ever when he played, but managed only 6 games last season, so his value to a team dipped (3.2 → 0.6 wins).

2026-27 forecast▲ 2.5 wins (+1.8)
Assumes a normal season; he played 6 games last year. Age takes about 0.8 wins off at 33. Range 1.7–3.3 wins.
Production (BPM)+0.4 → -10.6-11.026-27 forecast -1.7
Only 121 minutes last season, too few to call a trend.
2023-24: +0.4 · 53 games2024-25: -1.1 · 53 games2025-26: -10.6 · 6 games2026-27: -1.7 (forecast)23-2425-2626-27
Value to team (wins)3.2 → 0.6-2.626-27 forecast 2.5
Down because he played 6 games last season, not because his game slipped.
2023-24: 3.2 · 53 games2024-25: 1.9 · 53 games2025-26: 0.6 · 6 games2026-27: 2.5 (forecast)23-2425-2626-27
Contract value2026-27: worth $5.3M vs $6.6M salary−$1.3M
He is paid about what his play is projected to be worth.
$6.6M salary2023-24: $7.4M · 53 games2024-25: $4.4M · 53 games2025-26: $2.3M · 6 games2026-27: $5.3M (forecast)23-2425-2626-27
Current deal: $6,600,000 cap hit · through '28. On the contract row the flat dashed line is this salary, so the gap to the 2026-27 forecast is the surplus.

Seasons from Basketball-Reference (2023-24 → 2025-26). Production is box plus-minus, a per-possession measure. Value is VORP-based wins, so it also counts games played. Contract value is what each season’s play would fetch on the open market. The dotted 2026-27 point is a forecast: his established level, a year older, assuming a normal season.

Contract

2026-27
$6,600,000Guaranteed
3% of the club’s payroll · 9th of 17 priced deals
Runs through2 seasons
Est. market value$5,330,667 /yr
Surplus−$1,269,333
FAIR VALUEpaid about what he is worth

Market value is an estimate, not a reported figure: what his play is forecast to fetch on the open market in 2026-27 — his current rating, a year older. Cap thresholds are projected for 2026-27 until the league sets them.

2026-27 off-season

2 moves

OFFICIAL means the league’s own records carry the move; AGREED means a trusted insider reported it and the league has not processed it yet. Terms and attribution come from the wire, which is the only source that carries them.

Plays like

same position

Nearest skill profiles across the seven rating axes — who he plays like, not who is as good. The rating beside each name answers that second question.