🏀Front Office2026-27
 
← Los Angeles Clippers
68
OVR

Kobe Sanders

Los Angeles Clippers · #4 · Reserve
SG6'8"207 lbage 241 yr expNevadaSan Diego, CA
12th best of 13 on LAC
OFF67DEF73
High-level shooter & interior finisher
LAC
Los Angeles Clippers
Western · Pacific · proj. 42-40 (▲+0.9)
→

A young 3-and-D hopeful whose calling card is the jumper — 40.8% from deep in a bench role, in the 80th percentile as a shooter. He's not yet a creator or much of a finisher, and the overall impact metrics are still negative, but the stroke gives him a real path to a niche. The team holds an option on him.

7.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.6
APG
0.7
SPG
0.1
BPG
GP 68MPG 19.9FG% 46.63P% 40.8FT% 82.6TS% 59.7USG% 16.3PER 10BPM -2.9VORP -0.3
2025-26 regular season · bars are percentile at his position

NBA player ratings

0–99 · 2025-26 form
Shooting86
Inside finishing78
Perimeter defense77
Scoring74
Rebounding72
Rim protection65
Playmaking58

Skill ratings are 2025-26 per-game and advanced stats (Basketball-Reference) ranked 0–99 within position (guards vs guards, bigs vs bigs). Overall is anchored to EPM impact on a non-linear curve, nudged by these skills; Offense and Defense come from box plus-minus. A player who missed the latest season is shown from his most recent one.

Contract

2026-27
$2,800,000Guaranteed
1% of the club’s payroll · 13th of 17 priced deals
Runs through4 seasons
Est. market value$3,143,536 /yr
Surplus+$343,536
FAIR VALUEpaid about what he is worth

Market value is an estimate, not a reported figure: what his play is forecast to fetch on the open market in 2026-27 — his current rating, a year older. Cap thresholds are projected for 2026-27 until the league sets them.

2026-27 off-season

1 move

OFFICIAL means the league’s own records carry the move; AGREED means a trusted insider reported it and the league has not processed it yet. Terms and attribution come from the wire, which is the only source that carries them.

Plays like

same position

Nearest skill profiles across the seven rating axes — who he plays like, not who is as good. The rating beside each name answers that second question.